CONTEMPT OF COURT LAW VERSUS IMRAN KHAN

BY:

MIAN MUHIBULLAH KAKAKHEL

SENIOR ADVOCATE

SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN

 

      The law of Contempt of Court is non-existent in Pakistan hence Imran Khan has wrongly been summoned to the court and cannot be punished under the law. The law of Contempt of Court was enacted in 1976 called Contempt of Court Act, 1976 which provided for summoning, charging and punishing a person accused of committing contempt of the court. The act was subsequently repealed vide ordinance No. V of 2003. The ordinance lapsed after completing its four months constitutional age and no further ordinance was promulgated. The same ordinance was never placed before the parliament for approval. The previous law of Contempt of Court i.e. Act of 1976 having been repealed could not be resurrected under the constitution, resultantly, today no law of Contempt of Court exists and the superior courts having chosen to function more on executive side than doing judicial work could not take notice that after repeal of ordinance of 2003 no law of Contempt of Court survived.

        I am making this submission with reference to Article 264 of the Constitution where it has been specifically provided that a law, (An ordinance) when repealed or is deemed to have been repealed by, under, or by virtue of the Constitution the repealed law cannot be revived after the repeal of the repealing law, hence, article 204 of the Constitution does not have the logistics provided by 204(3) to summon, charge or punish contemnor as the powers under section 204 are to be exercised through an act of parliament and the act of parliament i.e. Contempt of Court Act, 1976 having been repealed and the ordinance of 2003 dealing with the Contempt of Court having lapsed or having not been placed for ratification is also non-existent. It therefore, follows that the punishment for contempt awarded to Prime Minister Gillani is questionable and summoning of some other dignitaries under the Contempt Law was also not supported by law. The Supreme Court has summoned Imran Khan for having allegedly used some words not liked by the delicate Supreme Court judges but ironically no provision of law existed for summoning Imran Khan, the Chief of Pakistan Tehreek Insaf, the merits of the case besides.

         It is high time that superior courts should refrain from using unbriddled powers purportedly or under any vivid supposition of law. The use of words “You Fool” did not bother the House of Lords to issue a Contempt notice as in their Lordship wisdom the comment amounted to an exception to the law of Contempt and was allowed under the Fundamental Right of Freedom of Speech.

         In their Lordship’s wisdom the act of publishers and printers in publishing “You Fool” amounted to Freedom of Press and Expression. The judges should therefore resist the temptation of ego satisfaction through use of absolute power.

         When their Lordship of the privy council were referred to as “Five Donkeys” their Lordships swallowed the reference because they knew that everybody knows that they are human beings and not donkeys and any reference could possibly be because of their hard work and not because they are donkeys. The freedom of press and expression allowed such a remark and the House of Lords could not take cognizance. In yet another occasion when a shoe was thrown on a judge of the superior court in America right during the court proceeding the judge remarked that it was not aimed at him, hence, no action taken.

      “Contempt power, though jurisdictionally large, is discretionary in its unsheathed exercise. Every commission of contempt need not erupt in indignant committal or demand punishment because judges, by training, are judicious. Their valour is non-violent and their wisdom goes into action when played upon by a volley of values, least of which is personal protection because wide discretion, circumspection and public consideration benignantly guide contempt power. To a judge when in role of prosecutor on a contempt charge justice is not arrogance, power is not petulance, prudence is not weakness and mercy is a mark of strength and not a whimper of weakness”. Observed Chief Justice (Rtd) Sardar Mohammad Iqbal.

          Contempt of Court Ordinance 1 of 2004 expired after completion of constitutional period and the act of 2012 dealing with the Contempt of Court was set aside by the Supreme Court leaving no law behind dealing with Contempt of Court. In Baz Muhammad Kakar Case the Supreme Court had to take shelter behind Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 which could not be revived by the Supreme Court due to the express bar of article 264 of the Constitution, hence, the legislature needs to enact the Contempt of Court Act afresh dealing with the present day media oriented society and keeping in view the Freedom of Speech, Press & Expression. The legislature should enact the Contempt of Court law in consonance with the requirements of present day society and the holy cause should start milking now instead of becoming hermits in the shrine of Justice.  The Contempt Law be enacted by the parliament after due deliberation and discussion with Bar Associations, Bar Councils, Media Men and Judiciary.

 

 

A detailed article on Law of Contempt of Court will follow this entreaty.  

Press News

Advocate general’s assistance sought in SDA asset transfer case

PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court on Tuesday directed the advocate general of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa...

Amendment in PBC rules

The Pakistan Bar Council decided to amend its rules through which students would complete an LLB...

Safeguarding: High court comes to rescue of SDA employees

PESHAWAR: A division bench of the Peshawar High Court restrained the Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa...

Seeking answers: Court rules in favour of SDA employees

PESHAWAR: A division bench of the Peshawar High Court has issued notices to the provincial...

PHC dismayed at faulty investigation of cases by police

PESHAWAR: A senior judge of the Peshawar High Court (PHC) on Tuesday expressed dismay at the...

Social media websites’ misuse has destroyed society, observes PHC CJ

PESHAWAR: Peshawar High Court (PHC) Mazhar Alam Miankhel observed on Thursday that the misuse of...

Khyber college: PHC stays appointment process for principal

PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court stayed the appointment process for the principal of Khyber...

Not following orders: Contempt of court notice issued to LRH, HMC members

PESHAWAR: A divisional bench of Peshawar High Court issued contempt of court notices on Monday...

Peshawar Institute of Cardiology: Court stays decision to place cardiology institute under LRH BoG

PESHAWAR: The decision to place Peshawar Institute of Cardiology (PIC) under the Board of...

Couple indicted in cop picture sharing case

PESHAWAR: A local court on Saturday indicted a fashion model and her husband for sharing...

Court stays transfer of SDA properties

PESHAWAR: A Peshawar High Court bench on Wednesday stopped the provincial government from...

Legal notice served on CM, other officials

PESHAWAR: The Sarhad Development Authority Employees Federation (SDAEF) has served a legal...

Court matters: PHC grants time to K-P AG over dissolution of SDA

PESHAWAR:  A divisional bench of Peshawar High Court on Tuesday granted time to the...

PHC stays appointment of Khyber Medical College, Peshawar principal

PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court on Tuesday stayed the process to appoint the Khyber Medical...

Peshawar High court orders status quo on Post Graduate Medical Institute dissolution

PESHAWAR: The Peshawar High Court on Thursday directed the lawyer for PTI chairman Imran Khan to...

Current Cases

Chief Accountant Officer Para Chinar got stay order from PHC

The Chief Accountant Officer BS 16 got stay order against the transfer order of another person...

Stay granted to Local Government appointees against the post of Sub- Engineers and Accountants by Peshawar High Court

The local government has conducted test and interview of the candidates for the post of account...

YouTube ban challenged by Pakistani Law Firm in Peshawar High Court, Peshawar

PESHAWAR: A Senior Attorney of the Supreme Court of Pakistan has challenged in Peshawar...

Recommended by

ap leading firm

image001

Follow us on

FacebookLinkedin